FabFilter User Forum
XLFO improved random feature suggestion
Still want this badly. Any hope?
Patrik Rydberg — Jul 13, 2022
I definitely see how this could be useful, but it's quite hard for us at this point to change the XLFO behavior and keep the plug-ins 100% backwards compatible. What you could do instead, is use two XLFOs, one without random steps, the other completely random, synced to the same note length, and modulate with a combination of the two. That gives you an adjustable (via the slot level) randomness, but not per-step though. If you really wanted, you could modulate the slot level of the random XLFO with another XLFO to achieve this. :)
Cheers,
Frederik (FabFilter) — Jul 14, 2022
Hi.
Suggestion for XLFO "random" steps. Instead of just "random", it would be pretty awesome to have an adjustable random range relative to the step fader value. So, you could set one step to randomize between 80% and 90%, the next to randomize 0-100% and the next to randomize 0-10% and so on.